Well, I have moved house and taken several boxes, representing a decade and a half of bank statements, old pay stubs, report cards, state bar notices from two states, student loan dunning letters, threats to foreclose or repossess property I don't own anymore, demands for payment of back taxes, client hate mail and letters of thanks (yes, I get both!), parking ticket second, third, and fourth notices, and a shoe box of inappropriate love poems from inappropriate people (or am I misinterpreting?), to the local OfficeMax to be shredded and recycled. But I didn't stop there. I've reorganized my forms library; deleted old photos of crime scenes from long forgotten crimes (and clients); put some coherent order to recent and current client files; and consolidated offices. I even donated six bags of old clothes, shoes, and books. I think I may be ready to refocus on this blog as soon as I slog through 250 unread emails.
Then again, maybe I've had too many cans of La Playa beer at 3:30 in the afternoon.
Nah, I think I really did do those things and I AM ready. Seriously, I have to get it together on MC_HIV. I have a lot to say even though sometimes I feel as though I've already said it all.
Here's what you need to know, New Parent: Your son can decide for himself whether he wants to cut off the neonatal equivalent of 15 square inches of flesh from his penis when he's no longer a neonate. It isn't your body. Get your filthy hands off it.
Now what? Maybe a little discussion on finance reform?
I dunno. I am cynical and I don't mind saying so. However, I also realize there is plenty of discussion in that way that bad lawyers do. Parse a few words here, parse a few there. Distract the court, send the discussion down some rat hole. But of course it isn't this side that engages in such nonsense. Rather it's THEM that talk about circumcision to prevent an unlikely UTI or to help some unknown, possibly unborn future wife or girlfriend's chances of cancer that takes the discussion down the deepest rat hole of all. Like any good lawyer, I counter the bullshit and redirect the discussion to the issues at hand. So yeah, there's lots to say beyond the "filthy hands" argument if only because as long as they keep talking we gotta keep talking.
And so with that, how about this: Thymos: Journal of Boyhood Studies reportedly has published an analysis of causes of infant death in America. It would appear that neonatal circumcision is statistically tied with SIDS as a leading cause of death in the first 28 days of life at around 115 per year or 1 in every 77 neonatal deaths. How many octogenarians (after a long life) are we saving from penile cancer by circ'ing them as defenseless infants? I doubt it's even a speculative 115 per year, and if it were, it isn't worth 115 lives not lived.
As soon as the pdf is available, you'll find it at the top of the page.
Link: Infant circumcision causes 100 deaths each year in US